The Regulation of The Use of Euthanasia In Indonesia and New Zealand In The Framework of International Human Rights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55681/ijssh.v2i2.1297Keywords:
Euthanasia, New Zealand Law, Human RightAbstract
The discussion of euthanasia is an interesting topic to explore due to the complex legal implications of both active and passive forms of euthanasia. This research will evaluate the perspectives of criminal law and human rights on the practice of euthanasia in Indonesia, as well as seek solutions to the complex dilemma between the needs of society by considering the rights of individuals and the legal norms prevailing in society. In this discussion, a comparison will be made to the regulation of euthanasia in New Zealand which regulates certain requirements. So that the problem analyzed is how the Comparison of Legal Regulations on the Use of Euthanasia in Indonesia and New Zealand in the Framework of Human Rights. This type of research uses normative legal methods. In addition, this research uses the statutory approach method, conceptual approach, and legal comparison approach. The results showed that Indonesia does not have specific regulations regarding euthanasia so that any action that ends a person's life can be subject to criminal articles. Another case with New Zealand which provides special regulations that make the regulations on this matter clear. In some ways it can be seen that the regulations in these two countries are very different where Indonesia prohibits actions that end a person's life while New Zealand provides exceptions to these actions as long as they are carried out in accordance with the law.
References
Cahyasabrina, Ghea Tyagita, Irma Abidahsari, Mohammad Al Rainer Geraldine, Hotmaita Arta Purba, and Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar. 2023. ‘Pengambilan Keputusan Euthanasia Pasif Dalam Kehidupan Akhir Pasien: Tinjauan Hak Asasi Manusia’, Jurnal Panorama Hukum, 8.2: 190–205 https://doi.org/10.21067/jph.v8i2.9388
Damar, A A I, Permata Hati, Ni Putu, Rai Yuliartini, Dewa Gede, and others. 2019. TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERKAIT PERMOHONAN SUNTIK MATI (EUTHANASIA) DITINJAU DARI KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA, Tahun, II
Emanuel, Ezekiel J., Bregje D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, John W. Urwin, and Joachim Cohen. 2016. ‘Attitudes and Practices of Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide in the United States, Canada, and Europe’, JAMA, 316.1: 79 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.8499
Fachrezi, Mochammad Alwi, and Tomy Michael. 2024. ‘KESESUAIAN PENERAPAN EUTHANASIA TERHADAP PASIEN KONDISI TERMINAL ATAS PERSETUJUAN KELUARGA DALAM HUKUM POSITIF INDONESIA’, IBLAM LAW REVIEW, 4.1: 228– 46 https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v4i1.246
Flora, Henny Saida. 2022. ‘JURNAL HUKUM KESEHATAN INDONESIA EUTHANASIA DALAM HUKUM PIDANA INDONESIA DAN HUKUM KESEHATAN’, Jurnal Hukum Kesehatan Indonesia, 2.2: 82–96 https://jurnal-mhki.or.id/jhki>
Frey, Rosemary, and Deborah Balmer. 2022. ‘The Views of Aotearoa/New Zealand Adults over 60 Years Regarding the End of Life Choice Act 2019’, Journal of Religion and Health, 61.2: 1605–20 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01359-7>
Geddis, Andrew, and Sarah Jocelyn. 2021. ‘End of Life Choice: Coming to New Zealand by the Road Less Travelled.’, AUSTRALIAN LAW JOURNAL , 95.5: 325–31
Gracia, Gracia, Dylan Aldianza Ramadhan, and Juan Matheus. 2022. ‘Implementasi Konsep Euthanasia: Supremasi Hak Asasi Manusia Dan Progresivitas Hukum Di Indonesia’, Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal, 2.1: 1–24 <https://doi.org/10.15294/ipmhi.v2i1.53730>
Halim, Hardi, and Tjutjun Setiawan. 2023. ‘Perspektif Alkitab Terhadap Praktek Euthanasia’, Jurnal Salvation, 3.2: 132–41 <https://doi.org/10.56175/salvation.v3i2.73>
Hustrini, Ni Made. 2020. ‘Pengelolaan Predialisis Pasien Penyakit Ginjal Kronik’, Jurnal Penyakit Dalam Indonesia, 7.2: 78 <https://doi.org/10.7454/jpdi.v7i2.440>
Irianto Korowa. 2019. ‘KAJIAN YURIDIS TENTANG EUTHANASIA MENURUT KUHP’, Lex Crimen, 8.8
Leget, Carlo. 2017. ‘The Relation between Cultural Values, Euthanasia and Spiritual Care in the Netherlands’, Polish Archives of Internal Medicine <https://doi.org/10.20452/pamw.3979>
Mcgee, Andrew, Kelly Purser, Christopher Stackpoole, Ben White, Lindy Willmott, and others. [n.d.]. ‘INFORMING THE EUTHANASIA DEBATE: PERCEPTIONS OF AUSTRALIAN POLITICIANS’, UNSW Law Journal, 41.4 <https://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/conservatives-set-up-euthanasia- debate-for-liberal-party-> [accessed 4 March 2024]
Michael, Tomy. 2020. ‘Requirements for Death in Dismissal of Constitutional Justices’, Research, Society and Development, 9.10: e8959109458 <https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i10.9458>
Munday, Tanya, and Peter Poon. 2020. ‘Geriatricians’ Attitudes towards Voluntary Assisted Dying: A Survey of Australian and New Zealand Society for Geriatric Medicine Members’, Australasian Journal on Ageing, 39.1 <https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.12681>
Onwuteaka‐Philipsen, Bregje, Lindy Willmott, and Ben P White. 2019. ‘Regulating Voluntary Assisted Dying in Australia: Some Insights from the Netherlands’, Medical Journal of Australia, 211.10: 438 <https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50310>
Rahmawati, Zilfania, and Ashif Az Zafi. 2020. ‘Euthanasia Dalam Pandangan Moral, Kode Etik Kedokteran Dan Perspektif Hukum Islam’, Al Hurriyah : Jurnal Hukum Islam, 5.2: 182 <https://doi.org/10.30983/alhurriyah.v5i2.3205>
Rompegading, Andi Machmud, and Bayu Pratama Putra. 2023. ‘Eutanasia: Tinjauan Medis, Bioetik, Humaniora Dan Profesionalisme’, Jurnal Ilmiah Ecosystem, 23.1: 120–34 <https://doi.org/10.35965/eco.v23i1.2506>
Sarwono, Antonius, and Sandi Agus. 2020. ‘ANALISA YURIDIS PRAKTIK EUTHANASIA PASIF DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PIDANA (DI INTENSIVE CARE UNIT RUMAH SAKIT)’, Jurnal Juristic, 1.1: 144–63 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/>
Septiana, Dewi, Al Sentot Sudarwanto, and Adi Sulistiyono. 2017. ‘IMPLEMENTASI PENGHENTIAN BANTUAN HIDUP PADA PASIEN TERMINAL DALAM PRESPEKTIF PERLINDUNGAN HAK HIDUP’, Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, 5.2 <https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v5i2.18264>
Soewondo, Slamet Sampurno, Syarif Saddam Rivanie Parawansa, and Ulil Amri. 2023. ‘Konsep Euthanasia Di Berbagai Negara Dan Pembaruannya Di Indonesia’, Media Iuris, 6.2: 231–54 <https://doi.org/10.20473/mi.v6i2.43841>
Sugiarto. 2023. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika), IV
Sutarno. 2014. Hukum Kesehatan, Eutanasia Keadilan Dan Hukum Positif Indonesia (Malang: Setara Press)
Thobroni, Ahmad. 2017. ‘Bom Bunuh Diri Dan Euthanasia (Perspektif Hukum Islam)’, Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi Dan Penelitian Hukum Islam, 1.1: 134 <https://doi.org/10.30659/jua.v1i1.1985>
Wardi, Ahmad. 2014. Euthanasia Menurut Pandangan Hukum Positif Dan Hukum Islam (Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada)
White, Ben P, Lindy Willmott, and Eliana Close. 2019. ‘Victoria’s Voluntary Assisted Dying Law: Clinical Implementation as the next Challenge’, Medical Journal of Australia, 210.5: 207 <https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50043>
Yudaningsih, Lilik Purwastuti. 2015. ‘TINJAUAN YURIDIS EUTHANASIA DILIHAT DARI ASPEK HUKUM PIDANA Oleh’, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jambi, 6.1
Zainuddin Ali. 2021. Metode Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
